Rhode Island is increasing its public investment in housing
Rhode Island voters approved a $120 million housing bond to address affordability problems. Last month, voters approved a $120 million housing bond, the largest in state history, to be allocated for planning, land acquisition, construction, and preservation of housing for low- and moderate-income people. Included in the referendum was a phrase indicating that as much as $10 million “may be used to support a new program for public housing development.” While it’s not clear exactly how the program will work, or even whether it will happen, advocates have been pushing for the state to create a public development entity similar to one used in Montgomery County, Maryland. There, the county invests directly in mixed-income housing projects, and instead of profiting off the market-rate units, it uses the income to subsidize reduced rents for lower-income people and reinvests its equity in other projects. |
Audit accuses the University of South Carolina of misusing COVID aid COLUMBIA — The University of South Carolina’s economic development office misspent $1.7 million in federal COVID relief funds, according to findings by the Legislature’s auditors, which the college president disputes. The review requested by a bipartisan group of state legislators also found the university’s Office of Economic Engagement likely violated ethical standards and sent employees to golf tournaments and football bowl games at taxpayers’ expense, according to the 165-page report released last Thursday. The economic office is tasked with forming partnerships between industry and the college, as well as licensing and commercializing patents for university research. The review by the Legislative Audit Council covered six years — July 2017 through June 2023. During that period, the university went through three separate presidents, including the return of one in an interim role. What auditors found was mismanagement and a lack of oversight, said legislators who asked for the audit in response to concerns they were hearing. “This is a damning report,” said former Sen. Dick Harpootlian, whose district used to include the USC campus. “I’d say this program was a total failure.” “Now the challenge to USC is to make sure it doesn’t happen again,” the Columbia Democrat added. According to the university, steps were taken to improve the office’s operations even before the audit’s completion. — South Carolina Daily Gazette Despite forecast of declining state revenue, Kentucky lawmakers prepare another income tax cut A projected dip in state tax collections appears not to have dimmed Republican leaders’ eagerness to again cut Kentucky’s income tax. Kentucky Senate President Robert Stivers on Saturday said continuing to reduce the individual income tax rate — this time from 4% to 3.5% — remains the Republican supermajority’s No. 1 priority in the upcoming legislative session, reports WHAS11 News in Louisville, where Stivers spoke to the Kentucky Farm Bureau’s annual meeting.Recently revised forecasts predict that Kentucky’s general fund revenue will decline by $213 million or 1.4% in fiscal year 2025. The projections were released Nov. 21 by the state budget director’s office in its quarterly report to state officials. This would be only the fourth time in 50 years that general fund revenue has declined year over year, said Jason Bailey, executive director of the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy. The other times were in 2001 and twice during the post-2008 Great Recession. The turnaround follows several years of booming state revenues across the country fueled by the federal government’s pandemic aid. Kentucky is among many states that have cut taxes or are experiencing declines in revenue as the stimulus spending ends. The surge in state revenues began to reverse a couple of years ago, according to a Pew research brief. “Annual inflation-adjusted state tax revenue fell in fiscal year 2023 from the prior year — the only time in at least 40 years that real revenue has declined outside of a recession. More than three dozen states saw their revenue shrink, including a steep decline in California that drove the breaking of the (revenue) wave, and in fiscal 2024, at least five states reported shortfalls.” N.C. hospitals push back against advocacy group’s price transparency report When was the last time you knew the full cost of a medical procedure before going under? Hospital price transparency has been enforced by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare since 2021, but whether the law is functioning as intended is a topic of heated debate. A new report from the nonprofit Patient Rights Advocate claimed that only 33% of North Carolina’s hospitals are in compliance with the rule, which requires hospitals to post clear, accessible pricing information for at least 300 “shoppable” health services. In the last six months, CMS has taken enforcement actions against six North Carolina hospitals, half of which are in the Novant Health system. “The purpose of the price transparency rule is to force accountability and integrity, to drive down the cost of care, and to ensure consumers are well-informed and benefiting from competition and choice,” Cynthia Fisher, chairman of Patient Rights Advocate, told Carolina Public Press. “Health care is the only place in our economy where prices are hidden and bills come in pieces by mail, weeks or months later. Often, those bills don’t reflect what we actually received, and we are overcharged.” |
Voter approval of an amendment is just one step in the lengthy process of securing state abortion rights
Since the Supreme Court ruled in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that there was no federal constitutional right to an abortion, voters in 10 states have passed state abortion rights amendments, including 6 this year. (In one more state, Nevada, an amendment passed this year but must go before voters again in 2026.) Many voters likely thought that casting their ballot was the end of the story. The reality is that passing an amendment is often just another step in the lengthy legal and political wrangling over state abortion rights.
First off, passing a constitutional amendment doesn’t automatically remove abortion bans or restrictions from the statute book — which means litigation is often a necessary second step even after an amendment wins on the ballot. This year, for example, voters in Arizona and Missouri passed amendments that on their face appear to overturn state laws. (Arizona currently has a 15-week abortion ban on the books while Missouri bans virtually all abortions — one of the strictest laws in the country.) Abortion providers in both states have now filed lawsuits asking state courts to block these laws and offer a definitive legal statement that they’re inoperative.
In Missouri, where the state’s amendment formally took effect last Friday, Planned Parenthood announced that it would not resume providing abortions until the court issued an injunction in its case. (The court heard oral arguments last week.) At least one sticking point is whether Missouri can still enforce various abortion restrictions, such as a 72-hour waiting period and a requirement that providers have hospital admitting privileges. In Arizona, by contrast, the state attorney general has taken the position that the state’s 15-week abortion ban violates the new amendment and filed a stipulation with the court that the state would not enforce the law while litigation is ongoing. At least some Arizona providers have stated that with this agreement in place they will resume expanded services.
Another set of questions relates to exactly what’s covered by a state’s abortion amendment. As the Missouri dispute highlights, many states have a web of laws and regulations relating to abortion that can pose serious practical hurdles to abortion access. In Ohio, for example, where voters passed an abortion rights amendment last year, the state attorney general has said he will appeal a lower court decision striking down the state’s six-week abortion ban. While conceding that the ban itself violates the state constitution, he argues that other provisions of the law should stay in effect, including a requirement that health providers assess and inform patients of the presence of a fetal heartbeat (with potential civil and criminal liability for failures to do so).
State news compiled by MultiState
- Colorado – Recounts in two races Thursday confirmed wins for Republicans Rebecca Keltie and former state Rep. Dan Woog, ending a supermajority for Democrats in the House. Republicans ultimately flipped three seats in the chamber, giving Democrats a 43-22 edge that is one short of two-thirds supermajority status. Read more.
- Kentucky – Gov. Andy Beshear (D) was selected by his colleagues to be vice chair of the Democratic Governors Association at the group's annual meeting on Saturday. Beshear was also chosen to chair the DGA in 2026, a crucial year for the organization in which 36 states will hold gubernatorial contests. The position is expected to give Beshear a boost in name recognition nationally should he choose to make a run for president in 2028. Read more.
- Michigan – Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan announced last week he is leaving the Democratic party to run for governor in 2026 as an independent. The move allows Duggan to sidestep what could be a contested Democratic primary with potential contenders including Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist III, and Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson to succeed term-limited Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D). Read more.
- Missouri – State officials confirmed the approval of a ballot measure to legalize sports gambling on Thursday with 50.05% of the Nov. 5 vote. The leading opposition group indicated it would not ask for a recount within the required 7-day period, allowing the law to go into effect and sports betting to take place in Missouri once regulations are adopted and sportsbook applications approved. Read more.
- New York – Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) is unveiling a proposal Monday to provide $500 "inflation refund" checks to families with less than $300K combined income and individuals making less than $150K next year. Hochul is expected to push the measure legislatively next session, which would likely be part of any budget discussions with Senate and Assembly leaders come March. The one-time expense is expected to cost the state $3 billion. Read more.
- North Carolina – The House is expected to vote Tuesday on whether to override Gov. Roy Cooper's (D) veto of SB 382, a wide-ranging bill providing $227 million in hurricane recovery funds and making a multitude of other changes across state government. The bill would increase the power of the GOP-controlled General Assembly and the state auditor's office, which will be held by a Republican next year, at the expense of the offices of the governor, attorney general, lieutenant governor, and public schools chief, all of which will be held by Democrats next year. Two constitutional amendments, one on taxes and another on voter ID, are also expected to be on the House floor this week. Read more.
- Texas – Rep. Dustin Burrows (R) claimed Saturday to have the votes necessary to become the next speaker of the Texas House, despite Rep. David Cook (R) winning the endorsement of the Republican House Caucus by a 48-14 vote. Republican Caucus rules require members to support the group’s endorsed candidate, but Burrows made his announcement surrounded by fellow Republicans, indicating they may be willing to buck rules to support him. Current House Speaker Dade Phelan (R) dropped out of the speaker's race Thursday. Phelan had been under fire from Republicans for leading the charge to impeach AG Ken Paxton (R) in 2023. Read more.
Comments ()